1) As the public service evolved with the other institutions of government in the United States, Critical decisions about design were made, weren't they? 2) Was Widespread patronage linked to mass democracy and to populism? 3) Did Politics more generally provide the justification for the incremental way in which merit and neutral competence replaced patronage? 4) Did an association file with wary antagonism? 5) Is it surprising then that the merit system was intended to create andprotect has become a frequent target of political criticism? 6) Do the role of the civil service and its power in government have grown larger? 7) What had to change to meet new demands? 8) Was the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 intended to make the service, particularly arthe top level of management, more flexible, more responsive, and more productive? 9) Was the civil Servic Commission abolished and new agencies were created to help with that task? 10) Additional reforms were undertaken; training and development were reemphasized and compensation was made less standard, weren't they?